도로법위반
The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.
1. On September 18, 1993, at around 18:14, the summary of the facts charged, B, who is an employee of the Defendant, operated the Defendant C vehicle with at least 12.3 tons of 12.3 tons of vehicles on the road of the Dong-dong Highway Don Highway, such as a Dog-gun, in violation of the restriction on operation of vehicles at least 10 tons of vehicles on the road.
2. Determination and conclusion, the effect of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2012Hun-Ga18, Oct. 25, 2012 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged. Accordingly, the above facts charged constitute a case not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.