When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 9, 2015, the Defendant, on the day before he owned by the Defendant, was not well-known from a non- packing road located on the land B belonging to the Southern Gun.

C In order to prevent the passage of the above road, approximately 1.5 square meters of the land from the area of the land from being cut in depth, and the height of the above land was installed at the entrance of the above road of approximately 1.5 square meters, and approximately 60 square meters of the length of the road of the 1.5 square meters, so that the vehicles and people can not pass.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with traffic by blocking the passage through the land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of the witness C in the second public trial records, and entry of the witness D in the fourth public trial records;

1. Satellite and field photographs, a certified copy of the cadastral map, and aerial photography;

1. The chief of the accusation (the term "landway" as defined in Article 185 of the Criminal Act refers to the land passage widely used for the traffic of the general public, and as long as it is actually common in the traffic of the general public, the ownership of the site, the relation of the right and duty of traffic, the large number of traffic participants and the identity of the only passage in fact shall not be determined;

In full view of the evidence revealed above (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 9Do1651, Jul. 27, 199). The defendant, regardless of whether the defendant has the right to ownership or use and profit from the land adjacent to the passage of this case, the road of this case constitutes "land" under Article 185 of the Criminal Act, which is a public passage through the passage of the general public, and thus constitutes "land" under Article 185 of the Criminal Act, regardless of whether the defendant has ownership or right to use and profit from the passage of this case.