양수금
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 109,943,167 and KRW 109,942,727 from August 27, 2004 to November 27, 2004.
In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the number of branch numbers), when loaning KRW 107,300,000 from our bank on March 21, 2003, defendant A entered into a credit guarantee agreement with the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund, and defendant B and defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the defendant's obligation to pay the indemnity amount to the non-party Technology Credit Guarantee Fund; the non-party Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund repaid the above loan on behalf of the defendant under the above credit guarantee agreement on August 27, 2004; the non-party Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund filed a lawsuit against the defendants under the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2005Da204198, the non-party Technology Credit Guarantee Fund was sentenced to the same judgment on November 4, 2005, and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time, and the non-party Technology Credit Guarantee Fund transferred the above claim for indemnity against the defendants on September 27, 2012.
Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the same amount as the above written order to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and all of them are accepted.