2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected the instant crime, the primary offender, and the circumstance of home is difficult.

However, the fact that the crime of this case was committed by receiving money under the pretext of agreement, and the nature of the crime is not good, and perjury is likely to be criticized in that it interferes with the trial function and judicial function, and causes an obstacle to the court’s efforts to find substantial truth.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, there is no special change in circumstances that make the sentence different from the original court’s sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.