2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and the fact that the defendant is against confinement life and that the defendant's health and home condition is not good, the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable in light of the records and arguments of this case, considering the following factors: (a) while working as an employee of the illegal gambling game room, and the defendant was discovered to control the police and escaped; (b) the defendant operated the illegal gambling game room; (c) the amount of the defendant was not small; (d) the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime; and (e) the defendant has the history of criminal punishment for other crimes similar to the crime of this case; and (e) balance with criminal punishment for other crimes similar to the crime of this case; and (e) other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant'

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.