However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 11, 2015, at around 11:00, the Defendant told the victim E (61 years old) of this case where the Defendant discovered that the Defendant had observed a shock of nearby fences while driving a D Ttiburi vehicle in front of the Busan Young-gu Clla, Busan, the Defendant told the Defendant of the above shock.

In mind, while the victim who was assaulted by the defendant's daily act reported 112, the defendant was forced to leave the vehicle in front of the above vehicle driven by the defendant, and the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object, was forced to leave the vehicle, and caused the victim by shocking the damaged person to the victim for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the crime of this case is deemed to be poor: Provided, That the damage suffered by the victim is relatively minor, the defendant does not have any other criminal record than the two-time fine, and the previous conviction of the fine also resulted from the crime of a kind different from the crime of this case, the crime of this case is committed contingently, the crime of this case is committed, reflects the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., taking into account the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age