However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 01:50 on June 24, 2018, the Defendant was a foreigner of Vietnam’s nationality, and around 01:50 on the Defendant’s residence located outside of the said residence, followed by the victim D (D, 22 years old), E, and the Defendant’s wife and international currency in Vietnam while drinking six working hours of Vietnam’s nationality, including the victim D (D, 22 years old), E, and her wife and international currency. On the other hand, the Defendant’s wife went away from the west E, leading up to dispute with the Defendant’s wife who is doubtful that the Defendant would keep wind with other women, and the Defendant’s wife went out of the said residence, and the victim tried to go out of the said residence and use the kitchen in the right way of the said knife and the knife and the knife of the said knife and the knife of the said knife and the knife of the said knife.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as “damage to the institutions within the mouth of a diversatory body, in which it is open to the river,” which requires a medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, D, and E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each response to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of each scene of crime, the category and category of the suspect, and the body photograph of each victim;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The prosecutor has already sentenced confiscation to one excessive (No. 1). However, the defendant stated that the above excessive amount is not owned by the defendant, but for the purpose of reducing the excessive amount of work, and that the above confiscated amount does not belong to the possession of a person other than the defendant.