When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On May 27, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six years of imprisonment with prison labor for attempted rape in the Suwon District Court, and was subject to special compliance from 00:00 to 06:00 each day during the period of the attachment of an electronic device, to take out the electronic device outside the residence of the person subject to the request for the attachment order from 00:0 to 06:00 each day during the period of the attachment of the electronic device, to take out the device outside the residence of the person subject to the request for the attachment order, to prohibit access to the victim, and to order the sexual assault treatment program conducted by the probation office 40 hours each day, and the Defendant was subject

1. From 00:00 on April 10, 2014, the Defendant violated the code of limitation on outing out of the country by drinking alcohol in the vicinity of the Korea Forest University located in 896, Pyeongtaek-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, and on the same day at around 03:58 on the same day, and by not later than 03:58 on May 25, 2014, the Defendant violated all the rules of limitation on outing out of the country at night, including at night, on three occasions at night, without justifiable grounds.

2. After receiving a warning, the Defendant violated the code of practice on May 26, 2014, the Defendant received a written warning from the head of the relevant mountainous district office located in the relevant probation office on the grounds that he/she violated matters to be observed, such as Paragraph (1), and did not follow the direction and supervision of probation officers, and received a written warning from the head of the relevant mountainous district office located in the relevant probation office on the grounds that he/she did not have complied with the matters to be observed. The Defendant received a written warning to the same effect on April 6, 2015; the Defendant issued a written warning to the same effect on June 6, 2015; the same date; and the same date on June 29, 2015; on June 12, 2014, the Defendant stayed near D and remains in the vicinity of the Silung City located outside of his/her residence; on the same day, he/she was dispatched to the prompt response team called at around 01:39 on the same day without justifiable grounds, as attached Table 1 to 201 through 18.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Written complaints, written rulings, and written judgments;