If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 23:50 on October 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) did not leave the taxi in front of the wedding hall located in the Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Ulsan-si, but did not leave the taxi; and (b) was urged to return home from the slope E belonging to the D District of the Ulsan-nam Police Station D District of the Ulsannam Police Station, Ulsan-do, where the Defendant received a report of a taxi engineer, and was urged to return home, the Defendant: (c) stated that the above E’s name tag was “one to be known, the bit of a bit of a bit of a bitch, the bit of a bitch, the bit of a bitch, the bit of a bitch, the bit of a bitch, the bit of which was paid.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that it interferes with a police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties who was dispatched after receiving a report by the defendant, and such offense is an unfavorable sentencing element against the defendant.

The fact that the defendant was committed while committing the crime is against the defendant, and that the defendant has no criminal records for the same kind of crime is an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the conditions of various sentencing, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be considered, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered.