2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

A. The Plaintiff implemented a pre-existing house lease business so that basic living beneficiaries, etc. can reside in the present living zone, concluded a pre-existing house lease contract with the owner, and implemented the lease business to the occupants.

B. On October 10, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on the lease of the existing house (hereinafter “the lease agreement of this case”) with the lessor, lessee, Defendant, the occupant, the lease deposit amount of KRW 80 million, and the lease agreement on the lease of the existing house from October 31, 2016 to October 30, 2018 (hereinafter “the lease agreement of this case”).

C. On October 10, 2016, the Plaintiff leased the instant real estate to the Defendant with the same period as the instant lease contract (hereinafter “instant lease contract”), the lease deposit amount of KRW 80 million (the subsidy of KRW 76 million, the Defendant’s charge of KRW 4 million), KRW 127,290 per month, and the lease period of KRW 127,290 per month, and the lease period of the instant real estate was set and leased (hereinafter “instant lease”), and the Defendant is receiving delivery of the instant real estate from the Plaintiff around that time.

On June 12, 2018, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on May 19, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 4 (including virtual number) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above findings of the judgment on the cause of the claim, since the lease contract of this case terminated upon the expiration of the period, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.