The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. On December 28, 201, from around 16:25 to 16:50, the Defendants’ interference with business: “F operated by the victim E in Changwon-si, Changwon-si;” in a coffee shop, the Defendants sought to compulsorily store the string in front of the entrance of the second floor, which was not assembled for the purpose of proving the Defendants’ construction; and Defendant A, who prevented the said coffee employees, took photographs of the string of the string of the second floor and the string of the string of the second floor; Defendant B attempted to enter the store; and Defendant B attempted to enter the store.

On the entrance of the second floor store as Defendant A, the victim and his employees set up a string in the entrance of the second floor store, and continued to bring in the string in the string of the second floor room, and the victim and their employees set down their physical fighting fights, such as pushing the victim, which caused the victim to be obstructed, and again, the customers entering the said coffee shop by force, such as putting the string of the string and photographing the string on the first floor parking lot, return to them, and interfered with the above victim's coffee shop business by force, such as interfering with the customer's access by putting the string strings on the entrance at the entrance.

2. Defamation;

A. On December 29, 201, between 15:30 and January 6, 2012, the Defendants, on two occasions, damaged the reputation of the victim G and H by openly pointing out the fact that “G, H (H (H) 1), and I (h) three persons conspired to post a banner indicating “the current provisional attachment status” at the entrance of the access road to the said FF through a public announcement of the fact by posting the banner between trees, i.e., “the current provisional attachment status.”

B. On December 30, 2011, the Defendants stated, “I accused F on the entry of the access road to the above F,” “I would have suffered pain on several occasions on the part of the people changing the design.”

Even though the Corporation is well doing so, it has maintained other construction enterprises and has driven the existing enterprises;

The principal owner of a construction project, which falls short of 5 per cent, directly.