If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 12, 2018, at around 03:58, the Defendant, at around 04:10 on September 12, 2018, was boarding a D taxi owned by the victim C, which was driven by B in the vicinity of the Yongyangdong, Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and requested the taxi engineer to “I do not have a mobile phone exhauster, so I would like to request a telephone instead of the police station. I would like to dismiss the taxi engineer on the ground that he could not make a telephone while operating the taxi, so I would like to impair the repair cost of KRW 10,00 by separating it from the taxi in his hand.

As such, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (report on hearing statements made by the driver of the victimized taxi;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs of taxi licenses taken by the suspect;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;