1. As to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on this part and convicted the Defendant on the grounds that the Defendant’s violation of the Public Official Election Act was all found among the facts charged in the instant case’s charges, on the grounds that: (a) the Defendant’s violation of the Public Official Election Act due to each candidate’s neglect as indicated in the attached list of crimes Nos. 4, 5, 7, 11 through 30, 32 through 62, 65, 67, 68, 79 through 83, 85 through

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the above determination by the court below is just, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles on the Public Official Election Act.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, it is justifiable to maintain the first instance judgment that found the Defendant not guilty of the violation of the Public Official Election Act by deeming that there was no proof of the relevant crime, among the facts charged in the instant case’s charges, as stated in the table of crime list Nos. 1 through 3, 31, 63, 64, 66, 69 through 78, 84, 93, and 94, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of misapprehension of

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.