2. Although each of the crimes of this case has a favorable condition for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges his mistake and reflects against himself, each of the crimes of this case is repeated by the defendant to find his own office at the Incheon Urban Area Customer Center and apartment management office and to use dangerous articles, and to make intimidation and assault them by force. In light of the background, method, frequency, risk, etc. of the crime, the crime is considerably poor in light of the circumstances of the crime, method, frequency, risk, etc., the defendant committed the crime of this case, even at the police station up to the police station, and committed the crime of this case. The defendant committed the crime of this case, even without being aware of the period of repeated crime due to fraud, etc., the defendant did not seem to have been subject to criminal punishment several times for the same crime, and it does not seem to have made any effort to recover damage, and all of the sentencing elements of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, victims, relation with victims, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be acknowledged that the punishment is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.