임금 등
1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. Plaintiffs H and I.
1. The reasons for the entry of this case by the court in this case are as follows: (a) the 3rd two of the judgment of the court of first instance “Plaintiff B” is dismissed as “the network B (hereinafter “the network”)”, and (b) the 3rd of the judgment.
In addition, “The deceased died on July 17, 2014 during the instant lawsuit and succeeded to the rights and obligations of the deceased’s property by Plaintiff H and Plaintiff I, his husband of the instant lawsuit.” The third 18 and 19 of “The Plaintiff’s 1,00,000 won unpaid to Plaintiff H and its related thereto” is “60,000 won (= 1,00,000,000 x 3/5), 400,000 won (= 1,000,000 x 2/5) and each of them are referred to in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of the following judgments with respect to the matters asserted by the Defendant in the trial:
(In view of the evidence added in the trial, the findings and judgments of the first instance court are justifiable). 2. Additional determinations
A. The defendant agreed with the plaintiffs to deduct the amount corresponding to the amount stated in the annexed Table of Standards for Deduction from Office at the time of absence, temporary absence, and early retirement, so the plaintiffs' wages should be reduced as much as the amount obtained by multiplying each of the above amounts by the number of absence, temporary absence, and early retirement, and the retirement allowances based thereon should also be reduced. However, the defendant alleged that the defendant agreed with the plaintiffs to deduct each of the above amounts claimed by the defendant from absence, temporary absence, and temporary retirement, and that the defendant agreed to deduct from the above amounts claimed by the defendant from the payment of the above amounts of absence, temporary retirement, and temporary retirement, but the statement of evidence Nos. 33, 34, and 35 of the above evidence Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24, and 32 are insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant
Rather, according to the above evidence Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24, 32, and 32, the Plaintiffs are required to deduct a certain amount from the benefits and the individual business expense in the event of absence, early retirement, or dismissal.