도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not drive a vehicle while drunk as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and only drank while drinking at the gas station.
The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case.
2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the lower court’s witness F, including the statement made at the lower court’s court’s court court’s court, and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant can fully recognize the fact that the Defendant driven the instant Maz car while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.107%,
The court below's finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of law by mistake.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.