A. Defendant A partially appealed to the purport that the Defendant’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 500,000) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable for the Defendant, and that the prosecutor appealed to the effect that it is too unreasonable for the prosecutor.

B. Defendant B appealed to the effect that the punishment imposed by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine both the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing.

The lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope of discretion by fully taking into account the favorable circumstances and unfavorable circumstances for the Defendants, and there is no special change in circumstances to change the sentencing after the pronouncement of the lower judgment.

In addition, examining the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case’s records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, each appeal by the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.