beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.08.09 2012고단1495

사기

Text

Innocence of the defendant

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) the Defendant, along with C, conspired with C to acquire another person’s property by using a one-name card indicated on the back side of the card and a special siren that can see it.

On January 31, 2012, from around 19:30 to around 30, 2012, the Defendant and C ambling with the victim F and G in the E-mail operated by the Defendant’s female her female her female in Scheon-si. The fact was that: (a) the Defendant used her inner name with which the victim can be identified as a special material in advance on the back of the card and read her her string, wearing a siren with which C can read the above indication; and (b) the Defendant her scambling by means of inducing the victims to take money; (c) however, (d) as the Defendant and C would normally participate in gambling, the Defendant and C belonged to the victims; and (d) used her e-mail card with the victims, and (e) by around 20:30 hours before the same day, the Defendant and C her gambling.

The Defendant and C received KRW 1.322,00,000 from the Victim F who Gabling in the above manner from January 18, 2012 to January 31, 2012, and obtained KRW 6.822,00,000 in total from the Victim G’s house, once from January 18, 2012 to January 31, 201, and once from the above Embridge, thereby making a fraudulent gambling by using the siren card in the above way as above, and obtained KRW 3.82,00 from the Victim G, and acquired KRW 3 million in total from the Victim G.

2. Determination

A. Basic facts [1] (A) Defendant, C, F, and G were brupted in Ehion on January 31, 2012, each recording record, investigation report (request for interview related to the attached C statement), H, and I, the police statement of the Defendant, the protocol of interrogation of the Defendant by the prosecution, the protocol of interrogation of the Defendant by the Defendant, the protocol of interrogation of the Defendant by the prosecution (including the substitution), the witness C’s statement in the third protocol of trial (the 11th trial date)] (1) Defendant C, F, and G.