On November 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution of official duties due to interference with the execution of official duties, etc. in the branch court of the Changwon District Court on November 22, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 30th of the same month, and has a total of 11 times of violent crimes.

On June 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00 on June 29, 2017, at the D restaurant operated by the victim C in Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si; (b) the Defendant collected a knife knife (30 cm in total length, 16.5 cm in length on the day) in the main room where the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif kn

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

“F” restaurant located in Jinju-si E on June 21, 2017, the Defendant of “2017 Highest 639” : 17:20 on June 21, 2017; 54 years; and

Dr. Dr. B. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. . L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

In addition, the victim's head was cut one time, and the victim was injured by an open wound, etc. that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 564"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Coloric photo;

1. Previous convictions: Investigative inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (Attachment of the same type of crime records), "2017 Highest 639";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Deficial photo of an injury;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (Aggravation of concurrent Crimes as stated in the Judgment above) of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.