except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 29, 2012, the Defendant, at the Daejeon Police Station, revoked a license due to drinking control, but there are many opportunities to drive the police on the Internet to drive the police, thus, the Defendant, who forged and sold identification cards, graduation certificates, etc., known on the Internet in order to control the police, paid the money to the President of the Busan Police Station, who is a business operator who sells and sells the identification cards, was willing to forge the driver’

On November 14, 2012, the Defendant called to the mobile phone (K) of a sales agent of an unspecified document and agreed to pay one million won in return for forging his/her driver's license. On November 14, 2012, the Defendant transferred one million won to one bank account (L) designated by him/her, and requested document forgery by sending his/her personal information and a copy of his/her certificate of driver's license after the e-mail used by the sales agent.

Accordingly, a sales agent of non-listed documents, including the one-person J president, shall record M's personal information in an irregular way around that time, and make a driver's license stamped with the official seal of the Commissioner of the Daejeon Provincial Police Agency, and sent the defendant's door-to-door license around November 19, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant forged a driver's license under the name of the Director of the Daejeon National Police Agency of N University, which is an official document, in collusion with a seller of counterfeit documents, such as J President, for the purpose of uttering.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol ofO, P, and Q;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a report on internal investigation (the details of text messages forged of documents, e-mail materials, identification of forgery, photographs, remainders, monetary records, and the confirmation of data on the currency who is the counter

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The sentence shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant does not have the same criminal records for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, that there is no trace that the defendant used the forged driver's license of this case, and that the defendant recognized the criminal facts and repented.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.