beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2010.11.24 2009가합7493

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

A. As to each land listed in separate sheet 1 to 17

Reasons

1. The following facts (the principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be deemed to be the same) may be found either as a dispute between the parties, or as a whole by taking into account the descriptions of Gap 1 to 44 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap 46, Eul 6, and Eul 6, and the testimony of the witness C as a whole:

The plaintiff is a company aimed at housing projects and housing site preparation projects, and the defendant is an employee working for the plaintiff company from January 1, 1987 to May 1, 1998.

B. On January 3, 1989, the Plaintiff decided to purchase the land listed in [Attachment 1 to 17] of [Attachment D owned by D (hereinafter “instant land”) under the Defendant’s name. On January 3, 1989, the Plaintiff had the Defendant enter into a sales contract for the instant land between D and D.

C. The plaintiff paid the purchase price of the land of this case to D. The defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 20, 1989 as to the land listed in the attached list Nos. 1 through 5, and Paragraph 11 of this Article, and issued a letter to the plaintiff, after completing the registration of ownership transfer in the future of the defendant. As to the land listed in the attached list Nos. 6 through 10, 12, and 17, the registration of ownership transfer is completed in the future of the defendant on November 1, 1994.

On the other hand, around December 192, the defendant agreed to set up the right to collateral security in the name of the plaintiff with respect to the land of this case and issued a blank mortgage contract (A No. 18-3) and a certificate of seal impression to the plaintiff.

E. On August 196, the Plaintiff obtained a building permit under the name of the Defendant for convenience on the land listed in paragraph (11) of the attached Table No. 11 (hereinafter “instant land”), and decided to newly construct the building listed in paragraph (17) of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant building”). On February 19, 1997, the Plaintiff concluded a construction contract with F, the representative of E, for the new building cost of KRW 129,00,000 for the construction work.

F. The defendant is a new building.