If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On February 13, 2014, from around 15:30 on the same day to 16:30 on the same day, the Defendant and B met the time expenses to the victim E (e.g., whether he sells strings or not, food satisfy, and not having good food,) who operates the above restaurant.

The Defendant and B, while spiting the victim “Chewing typ, spiting,” made it impossible for several customers who had been in the restaurant to go out of the restaurant or enter into the restaurant, such as spiting spits on the floor and spiting spits on the floor, etc.

Ultimately, the Defendant jointly with B and thereby interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 310 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;