If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On April 23, 2017, at around 21:50, the Defendant expressed his desire to “D E” on the street, “D E” in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, for the reason that the Defendant, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Western Police Station, who was called upon receiving a report from 112, would ask the family’s contact address and domicile, and address, and that he would be able to ask the family’s address, address, etc., in front of “D E” while under the influence of alcohol, and assaulted E with his left hand, as if he is hicking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is a taxi engineer and a trial expense on the ground of the sentencing of Article 334(1). It is not good for a police officer to be a crime committed by assaulting a police officer on the ground of the sentencing, but the degree of assault is minor, and it is a minor and contingent punishment by drinking, etc. shall be determined as per the order.