When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a machine manufacturer, a victim B (49 years old, south) who leases a factory building and operates the factory.

The Defendant, in around 09:00 on October 1, 2015, in the D factory located in 09:00, was suffering from disputes with the victim as a matter of the rent for a closed factory with the victim, and the Defendant would lock the factory unless the victimized person is aware of the rent.

In this regard, the horses were defective, cut, and assaulted, such as "batling spath, spathing", "bating spathing, bating a victim's bat and spathing spaths."

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;