except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:00 on October 5, 2019, the Defendant voluntarily acted in the Daegu Northern Police Station C district located in Daegu Northern District, and received a report from D on 112 to verify the circumstances of the case, the Defendant, at around 03:50 on the same day, committed assault against D, who was under protective measures, on the part of D, “C district in Daegu Northern Police Station C district, i.e., e., e., g., e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g. g., g., g., g., g

As a result, the suspect interfered with the legitimate performance of the duty of the police officer on the 112 reporting handling duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A copy of work log and public official identification card;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of dynamic images and closure photographs);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a crime committed by a defendant by assaulting a police officer to obstruct the performance of official duties, taking into account the grounds for sentencing disadvantageous to that of the crime, and considering the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the fact that there is no criminal history exceeding the same criminal history and fine, etc., the sentence identical to the order