However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around April 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) as a fraternity around April 23, 2014, the Defendant was an owner of a 222-year fraternity (one million won per unit) which organized the sequences of 22,00,000,000; and (b) the victim was a member of a 2-year unit of the said fraternity; (c) the victim was a person who was a member of a 2-year unit of the said fraternity and paid the sum of KRW 22,00,000 per month from April 23, 2013 to February 20, 2015.

The Defendant: (a) around November 16, 2014, around Gwangju (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul”); (b) around October 2014, the Defendant, among the members of the fraternity, C, and D, who had already received the fraternity payment, failed to pay the fraternity payment, and thus suspended the operation of the said fraternity; (c) was required to notify the members who had not yet received the fraternity payment of the fact that they would stop paying the fraternity payment; (d) however, the Defendant, without notifying the victim of the above details, was able to receive the fraternity payment continuously and use the fraternity payment; and (e) acquired the fraternity payment from the victim, who was aware that the said fraternity continued to be operated normally, by taking account of the amount of KRW 200,000,000 under the name of the Defendant’s account in the name of the agricultural cooperative; and (e) acquired the total amount of KRW 8 million under the name of the Defendant’s account. < Amended by Act No. 12844, Nov. 16, 2014; Act No. 15>

2. On November 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was in a situation in which the operation of the fraternity operated at the time was suspended as described in the foregoing paragraph (1); (b) returned the fraternity to the members who did not receive any fraternity such as E and F (the part in which the Defendant received the fraternity); and (c) was in a situation in which the Defendant could no longer operate the fraternity by soliciting the fraternity; and (d) there was no further organization of the fraternity, the Defendant was in a situation in which he was unable to operate the fraternity; (b) however, the Defendant was able to receive money under the name of the fraternity and use it for the Defendant’s debt repayment, etc.; (c) was able to receive money from the victim under the name of the fraternity; and (d) was 20 -0 million won (2.5 million won per unit per unit per deposit) by leaving the phone, and (d) opened the fraternity and opened a deposit.