If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-II cargo vehicle.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on October 16, 2015, and proceeded with the Douco distance in the Dou-si Dou-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along with one-lane from the original bank to the female bank.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by properly operating the steering gear and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop in the signal waiting direction prior to the course of the collision, and received the Dwork D of the Victim C driving who was standing in the signal waiting direction, and received the back part of the passenger car to the right side of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, destroyed a car owned by the victim, which is equivalent to KRW 745,60,00 of the repair cost, and did not immediately stop and did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the injured party, and escaped without leaving the said cargo vehicle on the road.

(A) The Defendant was not required to take relief measures because the instant accident was insignificant.

The argument is asserted.

그러나 아래의 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사정들, 즉 ① 사고 피해자 C은 이 사건 당시 쿵 소리가 나며 상당한 충격을 느꼈다고 진술한 점, ② 사고로 인해 피해 차량의 범퍼에 피고인 차량의 페인트 자국이 묻었고, 약간 찌그러진 점, ③ 피해 차량을 살펴본 E는 위 차량의 수리비로 745,600원이 소요된다는 견적서를 발급한 점 등을 고려 하면, 이 사건 사고로 인한 피해를 구호할 필요가 있었다고

The decision is judged.

Therefore, this part of the claim is not accepted) summary of the evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;