When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 17, 2014, at around 21:50, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports on the ccafeteria in front of the Ccafeteria located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do; and (b) carried out an investigation after being called out, the Defendant: (c) carried a toilet to the head of the Gu Police Station affiliated with the Gu Government Police Station that was conducting an investigation; (d) entered the restaurant with the Defendant informing D that “I am in the restaurant.”

As a result, I would like to go to D itself, and I would like to see D's face by drinking, while I would like to go to D', and when E at the same police station affiliated with the same police station, which was next to it, uses D's side blue again with the right blue blue by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, E, and F

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the defendant when committing a crime, and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties is considered as favorable to the defendant. The method and result of the instant crime, including the circumstances after committing the crime, the age of the defendant, character and conduct, and family environment, shall be determined as ordered by considering all the factors of sentencing such as the circumstances after