When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 2, 2016, the Defendant, by accessing the residence in South-Namnam-gun C and 4, via smartphones, posted an advertisement to sell one Soviet 1 in 7 S7 when galloning the mobile phone, and sold one so-called 7,00 won for the victim D who reported and contacted with it to 3,90,000 won for the galloning of mobile phones.

A false statement was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have intention or ability to sell one Soviet 7 Soviet when galloning the mobile phone to the victim.

On October 3, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 3,90,000 won from the victim to the modern securities account (E) under the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Details of transfer;

1. Details of Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the transmission of door-to-door photographs;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.