However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person in an unsound name to “to give money necessary to withdraw and deliver the money deposited in the account under the name of the Defendant; (b) to make a withdrawal from the bank counter designated to the extent to inform the account owner information, etc.; and (c) to the effect that if an employee of a bank asks for the purpose of use of the money, he would be the cost of purchasing a truck; and (c) despite the expectation that the money deposited is the amount of damage caused by telephone financing fraud, the Defendant consented to obtain necessary money and notified the account number (C) in the name of the Defendant.

1. On April 4, 2017, the name influor of assistance in fraud against the victim D made a false statement to the effect that “I would give a loan by raising credit rating if I send money to the victim D,” and that I would have the victim transfer KRW 8.69,000 to the national bank account (C) in the name of the defendant, and the defendant, as ordered by the name influor of the victim’s name, sent eight million won out of the money deposited as above at the port of North Korea, Daegu-gu, Northern-gu, 234, from among the money deposited as above at the port of North Korea, the Defendant released eight million won to the name influoring staff.

2. On April 4, 2017, the non-person who was named in the name of aiding and abetting the victim E’s fraud refers to a false statement to the effect that “I would give a victim E a loan after raising credit by first repaying the credit of the card loan,” and that he/she shall have the victimized person remit KRW 16.5 million to the national bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant, and the Defendant attempted to withdraw the money deposited at the new bank amba-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, in accordance with the direction of the person who was unable to obtain his/her name, in cash, at the 34th degree of the same day, the Defendant failed to withdraw the money deposited at the new bank amba-dong, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of

Accordingly, the defendant, by facilitating the fraud of a person without a name, has prevented it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;