If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On February 2, 2019, the Defendant obtained a loan from a lender under B’s name in the name of “B”, “D”, “Y-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E”, and “F” in the name of “B”, “Y-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E”, and “B” in the name of “B”, “Y-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E”, and “Y-gu” were entered in the name of “B”, “B”, “Y-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E”, and “B” in the name of the lender for the purpose of exercising the loan from the lender under the name of “B”, “B”, the resident registration number column, “D”, and “B” were entered in the name of “B” and the name of the lender under the name of “B” and the document and the document and the document in the name of the lender under the name of “B” were forged, and the document and the document were forged and the document and the document were forged at the same place.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and exercised each copy of the loan certificate and the contract, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

Summary of Evidence

1. The written statement of the police concerning the defendant's legal statement B, the document borrowed, and the automobile loan agreement;

1. Application of the register of automobiles and photograph laws

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act competition among the crimes of uttering of a falsified investigative document;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the order of provisional payment.