1. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s main store business by placing an order for drinking and drinking alcohol at the main store operated by the victim C, which is located in Gyeonggi-si, with no reason, and preventing the victim from citing the customers who intend to enter the said main store for one hour by placing an order for drinking and drinking alcohol; and (b) leaving the main place of drinking and drinking, without any reason; and (c) preventing them from going to the said main store.

2. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, and at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, around September 22, 2015, the Defendant “leeps against disturbance.”

“A” in the above C-112 Report, as D and E, a police official belonging to the police station of the Si-Ying Police Station of the Dong-dong, were the Defendant, and assaulted upon the face of the above E as they walked and walked on the water of the above E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (investigation and attachment of photographs of victimized police officers);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime;

1. The scope of the final sentence according to the aggravation of multiple crimes (one to one year and four months) in the basic area (two months), the basic area (one to one year and six months) of the grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommended punishment) (the scope of business interference) [the scope of recommended punishment] (the scope of recommended punishment] of the basic area (six months to one year and four months), and the basic area (one year and four months) of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommended punishment] of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, the scope of the final sentence according to the aggravation of multiple crimes: six months to two years [the sentence] of the defendant's age, occupation, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the crime in this case, etc., shall be determined by taking into account all the following circumstances and other conditions of the sentencing in the records.

There is room to see that the defendant is against the defendant.