2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16090, Jan. 1

On February 7, 2014, at around 02:07, the Defendant: (a) laid down the pentbbbbbre c ahead of Daegu Northern-gu, which was installed by the victim D on the road; and (b) laid down the shape by attaching it to the plastic tent of the single-use Liber Packaging which was in possession of the following.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each investigation report and internal investigation report (including each accompanying document and photograph);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of seizure, list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the following: (a) the Defendant, without permission, destroyed an article owned by another person; (b) the damage therefrom is insignificant; and (c) the Defendant’s mistake is seriously against his/her own fault; and (d) there is no record of criminal punishment other than one-time prior to a fine due to a drunk driving; and (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the instant crime; and (c) the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing such as

Parts of innocence

1. On February 7, 2014, at around 02:14, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim G in front of the Fmat located in Daegu Northern-gu, in the lower part of the lower part of the H. P. P. P. H. P. P. P. car at the market price of KRW 28.9 million, the Defendant: (b) caused the Defendant to destroy all of the facts charged, by attaching a fire to a single-use strawter; (c) caused the Defendant to destroy a string of the vehicle through the rear part of the non-breadth; and (d) caused the Defendant to destroy a string, tent, food, etc. in an amount of KRW 59,282,591, supra.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted by the court and examined by the court, the lower court’s front of the Fmatet around February 7, 2014.