1. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant tried to import sugars from other countries to China at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name located in the northwest of China, and to connect the victim at home to China.

If a sexual will is made, 200,000 won will be included in the same month.

He will write out the apartment company as the office operating expenses in the face of the Gu, and refund the bill only 2 million won after one month.

The real estate located in Young-gun E and F in Gangwon-do, which is owned by the Republic of Korea, will be provided as security because there is a good value.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any experience and capital in the sugar import business as well as in other businesses, and there was no specific basis for creating profits within 2 million won in the month by carrying out the actual business.

In addition, the above real estate to be offered as security did not have any right by the defendant, and the real estate E located in the Young-gun of Gangwon-do, which the defendant held a part of the shares, was only 40 million won in total at the time the public notice price of the defendant was 4 million won and there was no value of security.

On April 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred from the victim to the victim, under the name of the “Korea-Gyeongdong-gu A Asset Management Corporation” established by the Defendant, the ownership of approximately KRW 1,260,00,00 of the market value of the victim ( approximately KRW 225,00,00,000 at the time) and KRW 2218 of the same Dongdong-dong apartment B, which was owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant, around May 14, 2012, at the office of “Seoul A Asset Management Corporation” located in the border of North China, to the victim D, “on the face of 100,000 square meters from the office’s operating expenses.”

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person for the same reasons as the above 1.

The defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.