2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. On May 4, 2004, the Defendant, while carrying out the farming road packing work in the Sungbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun on May 4, 2004, brought a dispute with the Plaintiff.

On January 14, 2005, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Plaintiff on the charge that the Defendant made intimidation, such as abusiveation, against the Plaintiff. On August 8, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won for the crime of intimidation, and the said criminal judgment became final and conclusive on August 24, 2005.

B. After that, the Plaintiff was tried on the case of occupational embezzlement of 2012 high-level 83 by the Daegu District Court. On February 27, 2013, this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this part of this case

“5. The case number 2004 (case number 2005-00067) refers to the Defendant and the Defendant in packaging the vegetable farm road. The Plaintiff and the Defendant in 2004 refer to the Plaintiff and the Defendant. During this construction project, the Plaintiff filed a complaint for the conflict of opinion on the grounds that the construction business operator threatened B to the clamer (on the port Kamer and tape recorder) on the ground that B threatened him, etc., he would be bad, and that B would not attend several times at the police station and would not have any value as a human counter-party, and would have been sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won by responding to the refusal of the construction business operator to attend several times at the police station.” [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute. The entry of the evidence No. 1, No. 2, A, No. 10, and No. 30, and the purport

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The defendant provided D with the confirmation of the facts of the accident in this case (Evidence A 1-2) to D and caused D to submit the confirmation of the fact of the accident in this case to the court along with the impeachment of this case, and caused mental damage to the plaintiff, such as impairing the plaintiff's honor, and thus, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is obligated to pay consolation money, consolation money, 48,718,220 won, and delay damages for this.

B. Article 764 of the Civil Act