A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of four million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment of six months.

Defendant .

1. On June 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:40, at the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim E in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and (b) at the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim E, the injured party, while drinking alcohol together with the one-way A, B, etc., was prevented from smoking tobacco in the said restaurant; (b) demanded the cost of alcoholic beverages; (c) at the same time, an empty bottle on the table was collected toward and towards the chilling and cutting off, wherein the victim’s market price, which was owned by the victim, was 30,000 won in a glass hold equivalent to the market price of 2,000 won in the same place, was destroyed.

2. The Defendants’ joint crime committed on June 9, 2015 to June 20:50, and from June 21:10, 2015 to October 21:10, Defendant A, upon receiving 112 reports due to the damage of the property as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, called out to the said F cafeteria, and confirming the reported content against the said E., Defendant A, a police officer belonging to the police station G District of the police station corresponding to the Cheongju that confirmed the reported content against the said E, may know how much good you know.

Me, as her mother’s her mother’s her mother, she saw the right chest part of the above H’s right chest one time in drinking, and assaulted the above H’s left part of photographing the site one time in hand.

Accordingly, I (59) the police officer belonging to the same district group with the above H, was trying to arrest the defendant A in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, and the defendant B was called "Is to be replaced by No. 1000."

B. The Defendant C committed an assault, such as putting the above I’s right arms arrested Defendant A into hand, and the Defendant C attempted to arrest Defendant B in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, following the above I’s above I who attempted to arrest Defendant B in the act of committing an act of interference with the performance of official duties.

“Absing to be “,” and assaulting the said I’s timber, such as cutting down the said I’s timber.

As a result, the Defendants acted in collusion with the police officers about the 112 report processing and the arrest of flagrant offenders.