The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

2. On June 16, 2008, the Defendant and A entered into a verbal agreement with the owner of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G apartment 504 (hereinafter “the instant apartment”) to find as the H office of the victim F. The contract is sent by facsimile to the purchaser, and the contract is sent by facsimile, and the victim and the purchaser represent the buyer, to trade the instant apartment at KRW 14 million, but to acquire existing obligations worth KRW 87 million and pay KRW 51 million for the remainder by July 23, 2008.

After July 23, 2008, the Defendant and A metre in order to pay the balance to the victims in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, A operated on July 23, 2008, and A provided the victims with the first loan, but the second loan is delayed. Of the first loan of KRW 120,000,000,000,000 is limited to the amount used for repayment of existing obligations and acquisition tax, etc., and the second loan of KRW 2,01,40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,000,00 won, first of all, to the documents on the registration of ownership transfer, and Defendant B provided the victims with the loan of KRW 2,33,00,00,000,000.

However, in fact, the defendant and A, together with I, are acting as a broker for concluding a contract by using water in the above manner as well as I, and the J was trying to draw up the water by receiving a loan from the buyer using the proceeds of the sale when securing the proceeds of the sale after securing the purchaser's name lender. In the process, the defendant and A knew that only 120 million won can be loaned to the apartment of this case from the certified judicial scrivener, and on July 23, 2008, the J knew that the apartment of this case can be loaned only to the extent of 120 million won.