2. The fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake, and that the amount of damage in this case is not much significant, is favorable.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during which he/she had been punished several times for the same crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, and the Defendant’s assertion is disadvantageous to this court that it did not reach the victim’s agreement or recover from damage. In full view of the circumstances of the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., as a whole, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.