In accordance with the facts duly examined by the court, the facts charged are appropriately revised to the extent that the defendant does not actually infringe his/her right to defense, and the facts charged are recognized.

On October 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment in Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. On August 21, 2014, the Seoul High Court sentenced on August 21, 2014 to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and completed the execution of the sentence on April 29, 2017.

around December 20, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the court of appeal (Seoul Central District Court 2017Na2402) of the Seoul Central District Court No. 1, 312, where Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court located, and took an oath against the Defendant C and Defendant D with respect to the apartment of the F apartment G (hereinafter “instant apartment”) on the grounds of an agreement with the Defendant D on March 4, 2003, and Defendant D with each of the procedures for the transfer of ownership on the ground of sale as of April 14, 2008 (hereinafter “instant civil litigation”), and the Defendant D testified to the effect that “the Plaintiff, who worked at the National Tax Service, was given convenience to the Plaintiff at the time of 2002, reduced the amount of taxes more than one billion won to be imposed on H, and that it was not a bribe to the Plaintiff at the time of 2002.”

However, the facts are that the defendant did not offer the apartment of this case to B as a bribe, and the defendant prepared a club agreement on the apartment of this case in the name of D around March 4, 2003, from that time to June 25, 2003, he received KRW 500 million from D three times from June 25, 2003, and C also received around December 19, 2005.