1. On October 20, 2016, around 04:10 on October 20, 2016, Defendant A reported that “A” located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, was “B, who was a Materne, who was a Materne, with a toilet located in Seongdong-gu Seoul.”

Based on the victim's hand floor, he saw the victim's buck, and then saw the victim's blick, saw the victim's blick, and spread his blick, and assaulted the victim's blick with the victim's blick on the hand.

2. Defendant B: (a) at the time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1), the victim A sent her face one time to her face; (b) he/she received a report from the victim A at one time to her face; (c) her face was taken one time before the police officer called her face; and (d) he/she assaulted the victim’s face nine times by drinking within the police vehicle.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since each of the instant public prosecutions was filed on April 7, 2017, stating that "the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant" was submitted to the court.