beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2018.10.05 2018고단586

수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment of one year, Defendant C's imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant D of 10.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant E, Defendant D, Defendant K

A. Defendant E and Defendant D’s joint crime committed on January 1, 2013 to a person who is the team leader of the K Jeonju Factory Environmental Safety Team, established for the purpose of textile manufacturing in the O located in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City prior to North Korea, and was in charge of environmental management, such as waste disposal of the above company. Defendant D worked as a person in charge of waste disposal at the above Environmental Safety Team from March 22, 2010 to the above Environmental Safety Team.

Where a business operator who discharges designated wastes entrusts the disposal of wastes with a waste disposal plan stating the type of wastes, the waste transport and disposal plan, etc., and the designated wastes disposal plan, he/she shall submit to the Minister of Environment a certificate of entrusted disposal to obtain confirmation or confirmation of modification, and shall not discharge, transport, or dispose of designated wastes in a manner different from the details verified or modified.

Nevertheless, from November 2012, the Defendants: (a) from the foregoing K company’s new materials production team of the above K company from November 201, 2012: (b) in the case of producing fibers by manufacturing poly-P-P-phenylers and tephfththrochloros, melting them into sulfur; (c) producing fiberss by discharging them into sulfur; (d) high, strong, and high carbon rate; (c) so, the Defendants are entitled to waste DPE (the designated wastes assessed as toxic substances or other waste acids) discharged from the materials used for the production, etc. of bombs (the designated wastes assessed as toxic substances or other waste acids), which consists of 80% of sulfur, and 20% of low dust. (hereinafter “waste DPE”), verify other wastes called “pulmonary acid”), and discharged them into a P company, thereby collecting the entire quantity of wastes discharged from the PE company and disposing of them differently from the contents of the above changed wastes.

Accordingly, the Defendants are closed DPE on April 8, 2013.