정보공개거부처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasons why the court cites the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the entry of the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article
[In the trial, the defendant asserts that the information of this case among the information of this case is "any significant obstacle to the defendant's fair performance of duties due to the absence of necessity of requesting information disclosure and the disclosure of information", and that the information of this case 3, 5 is also a non-disclosure information under the Information Disclosure Act, like the information of this case that the court of first instance dismissed the plaintiff's claim. It is basically repeated in the court of first instance to the effect that the information of this case 3, 4, and 6 is a non-disclosure information under the Information Disclosure Act. Even if considering the defendant's assertion and grounds for partial supplementation, it is difficult to deem that the disclosure of the information of this case 3, 5 is likely to seriously interfere with the defendant's fair performance of evaluation duties." Thus, the information of this case 3, 5 is not a non-disclosure information under the Information Disclosure Act, and therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance which accepted this part of the plaintiff's claim of this case among the disposition of this case is just.