2. In full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, on the grounds that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant did not recover from damage; (b) the Defendant did not agree with the victims; (c) the Defendant was punished several times of crimes under the same several Acts; and (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated offense; (b) there was no extraordinary circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing; and (c) there are other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing on the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.