beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.02.15 2017고정165

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In collusion with B, the Defendant filed a false report as if he had worked as a daily employee for 382 days from October 2012 to December 2013 at the construction site of the Ye Chang Construction Co., Ltd., and the Defendant filed an application for unemployment benefits with the 15-luminous employees working at the 15-luminous Employment Center on or around January 27, 2014, for the said fact, and received eligibility for unemployment benefits.

Accordingly, on February 10, 2014, the Defendant from February 3, 2014 at the above Mine Life Employment Center.

2. To receive KRW 320,000 on February 11, 2014 by applying for unemployment benefits for up to eight days and by the same method as on March 10, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 12417, Feb. 11, 2014>

3. A person who applied for unemployment benefits for up to 28 days and received KRW 1,120,000 on March 11, 2014 and by the same method as on April 7, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 12417, Mar. 11, 2014>

4. A person who applied for unemployment benefits for up to 28 days and received KRW 1,20,000 on April 8, 2014 and by the same method as on May 2, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 12556, Apr. 8, 2014>

5. To receive KRW 1,00,000 on May 21, 2014 by applying for unemployment benefits for up to 25 days, and by the same method as on June 2, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 12574, May 3, 2014>

6. To receive KRW 240,000 on June 31, 2014 by applying for unemployment benefits for up to 31 days and by the same method as on July 2, 2014. < Amended by Act No. 12738, Jun. 3, 2014>

7. By February 2, 200,000 won was paid by applying for unemployment benefits for up to 30 days.

As such, the Defendant, in collusion with the above B, received unemployment benefits equivalent to KRW 6,00,000 by fraud or other improper means, and deceiving the staff of the broad-name employment center, thereby deceiving the employees of such center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of statutes on data about payment of unemployment benefits to A;

1. Article 347(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (including fraud, including fraud), Article 116(2) of the former Insurance Act (Amended by Act No. 13041, Jan. 20, 2015); Article 30 of the Criminal Act (including the point of denying the supply of unemployment benefits, including the point of receiving unemployment benefits)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes