2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. Interference with business;

가. 피고인은 2012. 7. 14 20:05경 창원시 성산구 C 피해자 D이 운영하는 ‘E’ 분식집에서 그전 창원시에서 기초생활수급자에게 지급한 식권을 이용하여 딸 F의 저녁 식사로 돈가스를 주문했으나, 배달된 음식에 소스를 제대로 바르지 않았다며 전화로 피해자에게 “돈가스가 이게 뭐냐, 소스가 적다, 씨발놈 좃같이 이게 뭐냐”며 불만을 표시하고 잠시 후 술을 마시고 항의를 하기 위해 위 분식집으로 찾아갔다.

The Defendant interfered with restaurant business by: (a) the Victim’s wife, who was the victim’s wife and the victim’s wife, “I am son’s son’s son’s fright to drink; (b) disregarding that I am son’s fright to drink; (c) am bling, and her motive to drink fright to drink fright at the time fright to drink fright to drink fright to drink fright; and (d) the Victim fright to deliver the delivery to the Defendant by taking the victim’s desire to “I am fright to drink fright to drink fright to drink at the time fright is within fright to drink fright; and (c) having the victim go back only to the Defendant, she could not enter the restaurant, and the victim could not receive the order from the phone properly.”

나. 피고인은 같은 날 21:50경 창원시 성산구 G 피해자 H가 운영하는 ‘I’ 중국집에 전항의 이유로 기분이 나쁘다며 술에 취한 상태로 평소 알고 있던 피해자를 찾아가 “시발 좃같은 것 식권으로 시켜 먹으니 음식을 좃같이 준다, 식권 받는다고 사람 아니냐 좃 같은것”라며 고함을 질렀다.

Afterwards, it interfered with the business of the Chinese government, such as making the victim close a door for more than one hour and more than 30 minutes at the cooling house in the restaurant without paying money, and opening the door for about 1 hour and 30 minutes at the table.

C. The Defendant.