재물손괴
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On May 13, 2016, around 23:00, the Defendant was accompanied by one cell phone owned by the victim, the market price of which is equivalent to 700,000 won, on the ground that the victim C (n, 47 years old), living together with the victim, and the victim, living together with the victim, was made telephone conversations with another male at night.
Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.
2. 판단 피고인이 2017. 5. 25. 경찰관과의 통화에서 “ 싸우다가 뭐 같이 하다가 부숴진 거 뭐 ”라고 답변한 점( 증거기록 제 317, 318 면 참조, 위 증거만으로는 이 사건 공소사실 기재 일시에 휴대폰을 파손하였다는 점을 인정하기에는 부족 하다 )에 비추어 피고인이 피해자 C의 휴대폰을 손괴한 것이라는 의심이 들기는 하나, 피고인은 수사기관에서부터 이 법정에 이르기까지 이 사건 공소사실을 부인하고 있고, 피해자 C의 진술은 아래에서 보는 바와 같이 진술이 일관되지 아니하여 그대로 믿기 어렵고, 압수된 피해자의 휴대폰 및 그 사진( 증거 목록 순번 제 18번) 만으로는 피고인이 위 휴대폰을 손괴하였다는 점을 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 만한 증거가 없다.
① In relation to the time of crime, the victim made a statement on May 14, 2017 to the effect that “the defendant first became aware of around November 2015, and had been living with the defendant from July 2016” (Evidence No. 23 of the evidence record) and according to the above statement, the case occurred before living together. On the other hand, on May 29, 2017, the police investigation made a statement on May 29, 201 that “the defendant was living with the defendant in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul District Court Decision No. 190 pages of evidence No. 190 of the evidence record) while living with the defendant in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul District Court Decision No. 20148, May 13, 2016.” (Evidence No. 190 of the evidence record) and each of the above statements are inconsistent with each other.
(2) With respect to the method of crime, the victim shall be on May 29, 2017.