업무상배임
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant holds office as the representative director of E in the interest of Si, and exercises overall control over the management of the above company and its assets.
On June 29, 2007, the Defendant, at the Industrial Bank H branch of the Industrial Bank of Korea located in Ansan-si, G, a member of the said Bank, provided as collateral the loans and the site for the factory owned by the said Bank and the building owned by the said Bank, concluded a comprehensive collateral security contract with the amount of 18 billion won equivalent to the maximum debt amount, the amount of 18 billion won, the Industrial Bank of Korea of Korea, the mortgagee of the right to collateral security, and the Factory Mortgage Act, which are the parties who created the right to collateral security. The Defendant borrowed a total collateral security contract with the amount of 12 billion won, the sum of 12 billion won, the amount of 66,666,00 United Nations (750 won per 100 United Nations), and the sum of 16,99,950,000 won per exchange rate of 750 won per 100 UN.
At the above H on November 15, 2007, the Defendant entered into a loan agreement with (LINE DESGN, I 2007) 1 type, 7 type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type (NE-480, J 2007), 1 type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type (NE-580, J 207)-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-based type-except.
As above, the Defendant concluded a contract that provides the above machinery as collateral to the victim, and there was a duty to keep the above machinery, which is a collateral, in accordance with the purpose of the collateral and not dispose of it at will until the obligation to the victim is repaid according to the contract
Nevertheless, the defendant around January 16, 201.