The lower court acknowledged ex officio the attempted fraud by deeming that the charged facts of the instant fraud include any part of the attempted fraud, and that there is no concern about the actual disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his right to defense in light of the progress of

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court did not err in its judgment by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on inconsistency with reasons or omission of judgment, deception and intentional intent of litigation fraud, or by misapprehending the scope of adjudication without changing the indictment, Japanese indictment, Japanese legal principle on the presumption of innocence, the principle of presumption of innocence, the right to

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.