However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is an employee of miscellaneousdo retail chain I, Defendant B is an operator of the above I, Defendant C operates J Co., Ltd. which is a miscellaneous wholesale company, and Defendant D is a miscellaneous wholesale business with the trade name "L" from Jung-gu, Busan.

1. Defendant A’s habitual special larceny: (a) from November 2014 to November 201, the Defendant came to know N, a M employee, as a customer supply relationship; and (b) maintained a pro rata relationship; and (c) deducted N from Pyeongtaek M warehouse, the wallets and labelling of the trademark N in Mucom.

Recognizing the fact that the goods are sold, around March 2015, the N, stolen and disposed of them with N, and there was a conspiracy to use them by dividing the proceeds.

Accordingly, the Defendant, along with N, stolen at the victim P and Q couple's Ma warehouse operated by the Namyang-si P and Q couple around March 2015, N brought the wall and Belgium in custody in the warehouse to the outside of the warehouse immediately before leaving the warehouse, and the Defendant, while parking the R tower in the vicinity of the R tower and waiting the network, when the N loaded the above goods on the above vehicle, they cut off by driving the vehicle along the N along with the N.

In addition, from N to April 11, 2016, the Defendant stolen an average of 7,000 bags and labels over an average of 10 times each month by the aforementioned method, from N to April 1, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property together with N.

2. On December 2014, Defendant B’s habitual stolen goods: (a) in the vicinity of the Defendant’s residence located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; and (b) in fact, Defendant B knowingly purchased KRW 500 per 1,00 per 1,00 price at a price lower than wholesale in a wholesale, with knowledge of the theft and sale of the landmarks and labels on Nmau Poco Pool from M warehouses; and (c) from that time until April 2016, Defendant B purchased KRW 20,000 on an average of 20,000 per month by the same method as above. < Amended by Act No. 6314, Apr. 2, 2016; Act No. 6306, Mar. 1, 200, Jan. 1, 200>