At around 08:00 on July 13, 2014, the Defendant found E in order to hear traffic accident between husband E of the victim and father F of the defendant. However, E did not come in his house, while E did not come into his house, the victim was sealed, fightd with the victim's body, the victim's head debt was sleeped one time, the victim's head debt was sleeped, the victim's head debt was sleeped, the victim was slicked by two descendants, and the victim suffered injury, such as slick flicks and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. The statement made by the witness D in the third public trial protocol (the statement made in the main part is relatively specific and consistent, and it seems that it conforms to other objective evidence, such as a medical certificate, and its credibility is recognized);

1. Inquiries about facts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates (Evidence No. 2), medical records, photographs such as damaged parts, etc., and written confirmation of release on a deposit;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the father of the defendant died due to a traffic accident that occurred by the husband of the victim, and the defendant and his family members died due to the accident that occurred by the husband of the victim, and it appears that the crime of this case was committed by contingency in the course of a defense that the defendant and his family members found in the home of the victim. At the time, the defendant seems to have suffered assault from the victim, and the defendant appears to have been committed by the victim at the time of the relevant civil procedure, and the conciliation has been concluded